*Subject:* OBAMA REGIME ALREADY GOING FOR PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS!

Are you ready for the House Bill titled 'HR 45, Blair Holt
Licensing and Record Act of 2009'. It will make it illegal to own a
firearm unless it is registered with the database in Washington D.C.
As a gun owner you will have to be finger printed, you will be required
to provide your DL#, SS#, you must maintain a valid address at all
times, submit to mental and physical health records being put on file,
you will also be required to file any address changes and any ownership
changes even if a private sale. Each update will cost $25 and if you
fail to comply you will lose your right to own firearms. This bill and
its language mirror almost completely one defeated last year in the
House of Representatives by soon to be Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
Will we the citizenry be as lucky this time?

Pass this on to everyone who believes in strict Constitutionalism
and remember that laws only apply to those who obey them. Criminals by
definition and nature do not abide by laws. New laws and restrictions
only apply to the law abiding citizen and are not written with the
criminal in mind. With guns, it is not about having laws on the
books to prosecute individuals, it is about taking guns away from the
people so that no one has them in the first place.

One last item to note, when assuming power and creating a facist state,
Hitler was a proponent of strong gun laws because a disarmed populace
was much easier to control than an armed one. The kings of old also
outlawed weapons of any kind in any region that they conquered to quell
the ability of the citizens to uprise against them.

The Founding Fathers of this nation understood all of the above
and because of this they included the second amendment in the
constitution. In fact, they knew that at some point in every society's
life span that the need for the population to arise came about. To this
end they made the right to keep and bear arms against a tyrannical
state an absolute right that could not be revoked.
They did this because the first thing tyrants and despots do is to
remove a population's right to defend themselves When this is done, the
tyrants have no problem with the destruction of society as we know it.

Send this on to all true patriots! Protect your Second Amendment!

The following is a summary of the bill as provided by the
Congressional Research Service. If you read the whole bill, you'll find
it will effectively preclude the ownership of ANY firearms by
law-abiding people unless licensed by the Attorney General. How long do
you think THAT would take??

Congressional Research Service Summary
The following summary was written by the Congressional Research
Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress.
GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.
1/6/2009 –Introduced.
Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 -
Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person
from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm
license under this Act or a state system certified under this Act and
such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Prescribes license
application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
Prohibits transferring or receiving a qualifying firearm unless
the recipient presents a valid firearms license, the license is
verified, and the dealer records a tracking authorization number.
Prescribes firearms transfer reporting and record keeping requirements.
Directs the Attorney General to establish and maintain a federal record
of sale system.

Prohibits: (1) transferring a firearm to any person other than a
licensee, unless the transfer is processed through a licensed dealer in
accordance with national instant criminal background check system
requirements, with exceptions;

(2) a licensed manufacturer or dealer from failing to comply with
reporting and record keeping requirements of this Act;

(3) failing to report the loss or theft of the firearm to the Attorney
General within 72 hours;

(4) failing to report to the Attorney General an address change within
60 days; or

(5) keeping a loaded firearm, or an unloaded firearm and ammunition for
the firearm, knowingly or recklessly disregarding the risk that a child
is capable of gaining access, if a child uses the firearm and causes
death or serious bodily injury.
Prescribes criminal penalties for violations of firearms
provisions covered by this Act.
Directs the Attorney General to: (1) establish and maintain a
firearm injury information clearinghouse; (2) conduct continuing
studies and investigations of firearm-related deaths and injuries; and
(3)
collect and maintain current production and sales figures of each
licensed manufacturer. Authorizes the Attorney General to certify
state firearm licensing or record of sale systems.

Pleased be advised and pass this along: House Bill HR 45, Blair Holt
Licensing and Record Act of 2009 Will, in my opinion, be the first of 2
or 3 steps toward confiscation of privately owned firearms.

You can follow the sequence as it already happened in Canada and the
UK .

First the government needs to register the guns so they will know where
to find them.

7 Comments on “BLAIR HOLT'S HR45 MAKES SARAH BRADY BILL LOOK LIKE A RAG DOLL”

  • amanda Says:

    It is very important to have guns registered to ensure safety and legality and to avoid future problems with the law enforcers

  • admin Says:

    Amanda. I appreciate your concern of registration, but the criminals will not register theirs. The bullistics tests from the guns they (criminals) have would solve 25% of the crimes in back log and put them away for life. It's not the citizens who need to be policed by the government. The registration is just so they know where to pick them up.
    A man without a gun is a ward of the state and a target for the criminal. On the other hand, a man with a gun is a citizen who can defend his countries freedom and insure his own constitutional right.

  • background check Says:

    Can you please tell me what's the difference between a paid or free background check?

  • admin Says:

    A free background check just looks for criminal activity where there has been a guilty verdict that my effect your status. A paid for, can show things that you may not exactly be proud of. It can show anything from accusations that may have been untrue and you where you were found to be innocent. They can reveal financial background facts that could have adverse effects. There is a positive note in that if you are the one that pays for it, you have the opportunity to dispute and correct that record.

  • How I Shed Thirty Póunds in Thirty Days Says:

    Hi, good post. I have been thinking about this topic,so thanks for sharing. I'll likely be coming back to your site. Keep up the good work

  • ApplyCreditCards Says:

    da best. Keep it going! Thank you

  • gun cabinet Says:

    Thanks for the information. There seems to be a never ending supply of great information on the net. I love learning new stuff, and will be back to read your posts regularly !! Thanks again :) Thanks,
    Sandy

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website